Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  28 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

26

A case for safe drug-injecting rooms

The Age

(30/12/15)

he treatment of drug addiction is

not a law enforcement issue. It

is a health issue. The treatment

of drug addicts as criminals ill serves

them and the state. These should be

self-evident points, but we feel

compelled to make them to reinforce

the sensible and humane comments by

a former premier and now chairman of

beyondblue, Jeff Kennett, in relation to

the establishment of safe drug-injecting

rooms in Melbourne.

Mr Kennett was in turn supporting a

call by Robert Richter, QC, president

of the Victorian branch of the

Australian Drug Law Reform

Foundation, for the setting up of such a

centre in Melbourne, along the lines of

one that has been operating

successfully in Kings Cross, Sydney,

for more than a decade.

Mr Richter this month said: ‘It is now

widely acknowledged that our current

approach to drugs doesn’t work: we

need to reduce or eliminate most of the

criminal penalties for drugs and start

regulating as much of the drug market

as we can.’

When he was Victoria’s police chief,

Ken Lay also said that we ‘can’t arrest

our way out of our problems’.

It is a philosophy supported by Harold

Sperling, a retired judge of the NSW

Supreme Court, when questioned why,

if cigarettes, alcohol and gambling are

sanctioned by the state, are not drugs?

‘The distinction is irrational,’ he said.

As Mr Sperling wrote for Fairfax

Media, and with which we agree, ‘The

futile attempt to prevent drug use by

prohibition is hugely expensive. Worse,

it makes criminals out of ordinary

people.’ While it was time to set up a

regulatory framework for their sale, it

was also time to ‘give up the futile

attempt to prevent drug use by

prohibition and to concentrate on

rational and achievable measures to

minimise harm’.

These observations go directly to the

perception of safe drug-injecting

rooms. They are not dens of iniquity.

They are not centres for criminals.

They are there to help people with an

addiction. They save lives by offering a

clean, controlled environment for drug

users and hopefully, through the aid of

staff, wean people off their addiction.

Is this not better than leaving an addict

to inject in a back alley?

And yet progress is marred in Victoria

because we suspect both sides of

politics fear a voter backlash. The Age

believes the tide has turned. Earlier this

year, Mr Kennett admitted that he was

wrong when, as premier, he opposed

supervised injecting rooms. He has

seen the Kings Cross centre in

operation, spoken to staff and addicts.

It works. The staff ‘should be receiving

knighthoods’ for treating addicts as

‘human beings’. He reiterated the

praise this week.

Alex Wodak, the president of the

Australian Drug Law Reform

T