Site search

newsletterletters newsletterletters
newsletterletters
newsletterletters
newsletterletters

 

 
About Us | Our Services | Membership | Contacts | Newsletter | Events | Your Thoughts | Drug Facts | Memorial Page


newsletterletters

Letter To The Editor

Dave's Rave

David Crosbie, Director Alcohol & Other Drugs Council of Australia

ref: July 98 Heroinsight

A couple of weeks ago, in the early hours of Sunday morning, I attended what many people loosely describe as a dance party or rave. I was accompanied by a couple of other old people. We were there mainly to support a young entrepreneur who had organised the event, and of course, to learn a little more about an environment that I have had little direct contact with.

To start with, it is quite a while since I have been in a large smoke filled room with music amplified beyond pleasure, surrounded by people in their late teens and early twenties. My host informed me that I should be impressed by the consistency and insistence of the pumping beat. It was apparently testimony to the skill of the DJs, who not only mixed different tracks together, but also slowed them down or sped them up to create an ongoing pulse that is meant to be experienced, not so much as sound, as a vibration in the torso.

Once my eyes adjusted to the dark, I noticed that although there were around 200 people in the room, it seemed as though most of the people knew each other. There were lots of hellos, long lost friends embraces, and even people I had never met seemed happy to come up to the old balding fat guy, introduce themselves, and assume we were best of mates.

There wasn't a queue at the small bar, so I bought a round of drinks. There were few other people in the room drinking alcohol, most had their own bottles of still water, some carried small backpacks.

The dancing was very impressive. I had rarely seen young people dance so impulsively to the musicÄno set steps but certainly feeling the music and using staccato body movements that somehow flowed together.

The queue to go to the toilet was its own adventure, but the good natured camaraderie was maintained throughout.

According to my host, between 80-90% of the patrons were using drugs other than alcohol, and the relatively open exchange of silver packages seemed to confirm this estimate.

Most of the dancers seemed to be monitoring their water intake, regularly taking sips from their water bottles.

I saw no incident of aggression, no evidence of security personnel, and people seemed to be having a very good time. In many ways, the atmosphere was much less charged than in my youth where excess alcohol and testosterone often led to unfortunate situations. The sexual tensions between boys and girls that used to be associated with such environments were not present.

While I personally am yet to rush back for another ear and lung bashing, I could understand the appeal of such events and how the choice of drugs influenced and to some degree, matched the environment.

It would be nice if everyone in that club could have the same good time without using any drugs or putting themselves at any risk. At the same time, I think it is foolish for people like me, quietly using my drug of choice, to imply that these young people are not making informed decisions about their drug use. Their decision not to use alcohol seems in many ways to be a much more deliberate choice than was reflected in the drinking behaviour I remember at a similar age.

In raising this issue in this way, I am not seeking to condone drug use, but I am questioning the popular notion expressed by drug educators about the goals of informed decision-making on drug use.

Young people are different from old people. They have a different set of values, different aspirations and perspectives on life and meaning, and thank God for that.

Being informs is only one aspect of decision-makingÄthe other is the value that we place on particular outcomes. People with different values will make different decisions, even given exactly the same information.

No one can really argue against informed decision-making (who could support non- informed decision-making?) but what if, after being informed, the decision young people make is different from the one we older people wanted or expected? What if, after extensive drug education, young people choose to use more drugs? Would that be informed decision- making?

It seems to me that what we really want from drug education of our young people is not informed decision-making, but reduced drug use. And if they can't reduce drug use, educators should at least try and make the drug taking behaviour of 19-year-olds more like that of us old 42-year-olds. Then we'd all be more healthy and happy, wouldn't we?

Back To Letters Index

 

FDS Site designed, created and managed by Cyberart-FX Web Design, Sydney, Australia