Site search

newsletterarticles newsletterarticles
newsletterarticles
newsletterarticles
newsletterarticles

 

 
About Us | Our Services | Membership | Contacts | Newsletter | Events | Your Thoughts | Drug Facts | Memorial Page


Tough-On-Drugs Policy Abysmal Failure: Report

Ross Peake, Canberra Times (6/3/06)

The Howard Government's 'tough-on-drugs' policy is castigated as a failure in a report being published today.

The Australian Institute report says hardline policies have failed to dent illicit drug markets but have exacerbated the social cost of illicit drug use.

It says stricter drug laws will worsen mental health problems. The issue of drug abuse needed to be confronted as a health rather than a legal issue.

A controversial section in the report, Drug law reform: beyond prohibition, is criticism of the Federal Government for claiming the main cause of the Australian heroin drought was international and national drug law enforcement.

Recent evidence suggested the most likely cause of the drought was a decision by heroin producers and traffickers to switch to methamphetamines, largely unrelated to the efforts of police.

The Institute's deputy director, Andrew Macintosh, accused the Government of back-to-front thinking, saying 80 per cent of state and federal funding for dealing with illicit drugs was going to law enforcement.

'This hugely disproportionate spending of funds has not been accompanied by reductions in drug use and drug-related harm, but it has been accompanied by increased mental health and other social problems.

'Treatment, on the other hand, has been shown to substantially reduce drug and mental health problems and drug-related crime and corruption. We are coming at the problem from the wrong way users are at the end of the line and the statistics show that legal threats are not deterring them.

'Prevention and treatment programs within a health context hold far more promise.'

Mr Macintosh said many claims of success over the illicit drug trade were illusory. 'The Federal Government pats itself on the back for the decline in heroin use, while methamphetamine problems have increased dramatically.'

The report says more liberal drug regimes are likely to reduce drug-related harm.

'A small increase in drug use may be the price that society must pay for a decline in substance misuse disorders, corruption, crime, mental illness and the other economic, social and political costs that arise because of strict drug laws,' the report says.

'For around half a century drug issues have been seen primarily as a legal issue . . . This strategy has been an abysmal failure.'

Back To Articles Index

FDS Site designed, created and managed by Cyberart-FX Web Design, Sydney, Australia